Lcb September 12

Comes now the plaintiff, Arthur West, and responds to the September 12 reply of the State. The defendants’ response fails to address any of the substantive claims and he declaration of counsel establishes that no SEPA determination of any kind was issued by the Liquor Control Board to support the latest version of its rules. In light of the failure of the defendants to refute that the OPMA and SEPA are clearly established laws, or deny ongoing violations of these laws, the requested injunction should issue. Complaint by Arthur West RCW 42.30.130 PROVIDES AUTHORITY FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO HALT CONTINUING OR THREATENED VIOLATIONS OF THE OPMA RCW 42.30.130 provides… Any person may commence an action either by mandamus or injunction for the purpose of stopping violations or preventing threatened violations of this chapter by members of a governing body.